2026-10-23-Gate4SPICE Event "Communicating Agreed Work & AI-Generated Work Products" - ONSITE[KR]

From 23.10.2026 09:30 until 23.10.2026 16:00

At Seoul, Korea

Posted by G4S Editor

Categories: G4S Events, Onsite

Hits: 1429


Brief description

Topic 1: ASPICE 4.0's "Communicate Agreed" BPs (SYS.2.BP6, SWE.1.BP6, etc.) are read very differently in the field - some accept a shared file or silent inbox, others demand formal sign-off and a baseline. Annex C.6 actually defines "agreed" as joint understanding among affected parties, not formal approval; but when upstream artifacts feed downstream work, a baseline (or equivalent controlled state) is the most effective safeguard for consistency and change impact. This session distinguishes the four levels - simple sharing, joint understanding, formal approval, and baseline - and asks: what is the minimum bar for "Communicate Agreed", and how do we keep downstream work aligned when upstream changes? 

Topic 2: Generative AI now shapes work products across every phase of the V-model, and polished output no longer reliably signals process capability. This raises three questions for ASPICE: is the artifact real engineering evidence, can the author be held accountable, and are AI-specific risks (hallucinations, missing quantities, superficial traceability, IP leakage) under process control? This session argues the assessment axis has shifted from "did they use AI?" to "is that use controlled?", and proposes a four-axis frame - artifact quality, human verification & accountability, tool reliability & control, and confidentiality & IP compliance - with each finding mapped to concrete PA/BP consequences. Attendees leave with a shift toward comprehension-testing interview questions and a checklist v1.0 for their organizations.


Organization

Agenda

 Start End Topic Owner
09:30 09:45 Welcome & Event Introduction Kyunghyun Roh
09:45 10:45 [Presentation 1] Session 1: "Communicate Agreed" - Sharing, or Technical Handoff? Seungnam Kim
10:45 11:00 Coffee Break  
11:00 12:00 [Presentation 2] Session 2: Evaluating AI-Generated Development Work Products. InTaek Kim
12:00 13:30 Lunch break & network  
13:30 15:45 [Hands-on Workshop] Group work (max. 5 participants) applying “How Assessors Should Evaluate AI-Generated Work Products”, "Communicate Agreed.” Seungnam Kim / InTaek Kim
15:45 16:00 Wrap-up & Completing Feedback Forms InTaek Kim

How to register